Institution record
코인원
코인원 — Proprietary Trading Terminal (Coinone)
- Source score
- 8.3
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (electronic trading terminals, execution gateways, fix bridge topologies and multi-broker software builds) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
No licence records on file for this institution.
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing 코인원 against peer institutions in our electronic trading terminals, execution gateways, fix bridge topologies and multi-broker software builds dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 코인원 (this record) | None on file | 0 / 0 | Low risk | 8.3 | 0 |
| MT4 | None on file | 0 / 0 | Low risk | 9.3 | 0 |
| MT5 | None on file | 0 / 0 | Low risk | 9.3 | 0 |
| cTrader | None on file | 0 / 0 | Low risk | 9.1 | 0 |
| Fidelity Bank Ghana | None on file | 0 / 0 | Low risk | 9.1 | 0 |
| Markets4you | None on file | 0 / 0 | Low risk | 9.1 | 0 |
코인원: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is 코인원's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
Our imported dataset currently holds 0 verified regulatory licence records for 코인원 (코인원 — Proprietary Trading Terminal (Coinone)), registered at Terminal Registry #607 · Architecture Type 2 · Operator: Coinone and tracked under our electronic trading terminals, execution gateways, fix bridge topologies and multi-broker software builds scope. Prospective counterparties should request primary registration certificates and cross-check the contracting entity directly on the relevant national financial supervisor's public register before onboarding.
Which of 코인원's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
코인원 is registered at Terminal Registry #607 · Architecture Type 2 · Operator: Coinone and tracked under our electronic trading terminals, execution gateways, fix bridge topologies and multi-broker software builds scope based on its institutional service profile (Proprietary Order Routing, Mobile & Web Execution, Real-Time Margin Controls) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 0 recorded licences (none on file) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is 코인원's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
코인원 carries a "low risk" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 8.3, risk & licensing: 8.2, brand: 8.3, market influence: 8.5, user reputation: 8.2). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to 코인원's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with 코인원 (listed execution software: 코인원), institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (apps.apple.com/kr/app/%EC%BD%94%EC%9D%B8%EC%9B%90/id1326526995) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to the supervising authority.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from Terminal Ledger Desk relevant to 코인원's supervisory scope.
Execution Benchmarks
Trading Terminal Architecture Benchmark: Auditing 679 Broker Software Deployments Across MT5, cTrader, and Proprietary Engines
Measuring order-to-acknowledgement round-trip latency, bridge plugin architecture, and multi-asset margin unification across 679 broker software deployments.
Server Topology
Equinix LD4, NY4, and TY3 Cross-Connect Topologies: How Liquidity Bridges Impact Fill Symmetry and Tail Slippage
Why physical server colocation and direct fiber cross-connects determine whether limit orders experience positive or negative price improvement.
