1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Bybit Fintech Limited vs FUTU: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Bybit Fintech Limited (Bybit Fintech Limited) and FUTU (Futu Holding Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Electronic trading terminals, execution gateways, FIX bridge topologies and multi-broker software builds
- Bybit Fintech Limited 6D Score
- —
- FUTU 6D Score
- 7.7
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
FUTU outranks Bybit Fintech Limited by +7.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.7 vs —)
On supervisory breadth, Bybit Fintech Limited holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas FUTU holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Bybit Fintech Limited | FUTU | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | — | 7.7 | +7.7 | FUTU (Recorded) |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | — | 7.7 | +7.7 | FUTU (Recorded) |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | — | 5.0 | +5.0 | FUTU (Recorded) |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | — | 0.0 | +0.0 | FUTU (Recorded) |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | — | 7.5 | +7.5 | FUTU (Recorded) |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | — | 7.9 | +7.9 | FUTU (Recorded) |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Bybit Fintech Limited vs FUTU
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Bybit Fintech Limited | FUTU |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Bybit Fintech Limited | Futu Holding Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | VG | G/F, 96 Nathan Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon (go right from Exit B1 of Tsim Sha Tsui MTR Station, opposite The ONE). |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Imported software record | Stocks |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Bybit Fintech Limited | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Bybit Fintech Limited and FUTU against other regulated peers in our electronic trading terminals, execution gateways, fix bridge topologies and multi-broker software builds slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Bybit Fintech Limited vs FUTU
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Bybit Fintech Limited or FUTU?
FUTU holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Bybit Fintech Limited maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas FUTU maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Bybit Fintech Limited and FUTU?
In Terminal Ledger Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Bybit Fintech Limited records an Overall Score of — (Risk & Licensing: —, Brand: —, Market Influence: —, User Reputation: —, Execution & Software: —), compared with FUTU at 7.7 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 7.7, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0).
How do Bybit Fintech Limited and FUTU differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Bybit Fintech Limited lists Imported software record with execution software [Bybit Fintech Limited], while FUTU lists Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Bybit Fintech Limited or FUTU?
Bybit Fintech Limited carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while FUTU carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.