1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FUTU vs GOOD: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FUTU (Futu Holding Limited) and GOOD (GOOD) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Electronic trading terminals, execution gateways, FIX bridge topologies and multi-broker software builds
- FUTU 6D Score
- 7.7
- GOOD 6D Score
- —
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
FUTU outranks GOOD by +7.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.7 vs —)
On supervisory breadth, FUTU holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas GOOD holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FUTU | GOOD | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.7 | — | +7.7 | FUTU (Recorded) |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 7.7 | — | +7.7 | FUTU (Recorded) |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 5.0 | — | +5.0 | FUTU (Recorded) |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | — | +0.0 | FUTU (Recorded) |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 7.5 | — | +7.5 | FUTU (Recorded) |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.9 | — | +7.9 | FUTU (Recorded) |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FUTU vs GOOD
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FUTU | GOOD |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Futu Holding Limited | GOOD |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | G/F, 96 Nathan Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon (go right from Exit B1 of Tsim Sha Tsui MTR Station, opposite The ONE). | US |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Stocks | Imported software record |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | GOOD |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FUTU and GOOD against other regulated peers in our electronic trading terminals, execution gateways, fix bridge topologies and multi-broker software builds slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FUTU vs GOOD
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FUTU or GOOD?
FUTU holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, FUTU maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas GOOD maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FUTU and GOOD?
In Terminal Ledger Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FUTU records an Overall Score of 7.7 (Risk & Licensing: 7.7, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with GOOD at — Overall (Risk & Licensing: —, Brand: —, Market Influence: —, User Reputation: —, Execution & Software: —).
How do FUTU and GOOD differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FUTU lists Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while GOOD lists Imported software record with execution software [GOOD]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FUTU or GOOD?
FUTU carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while GOOD carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.