1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
GOOD vs LMAX Group: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of GOOD (GOOD) and LMAX Group (LMAX Group) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Electronic trading terminals, execution gateways, FIX bridge topologies and multi-broker software builds
- GOOD 6D Score
- —
- LMAX Group 6D Score
- 7.9
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 3
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
LMAX Group outranks GOOD by +7.9 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.9 vs —)
On supervisory breadth, GOOD holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas LMAX Group holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | GOOD | LMAX Group | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | — | 7.9 | +7.9 | LMAX Group (Recorded) |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | — | 7.9 | +7.9 | LMAX Group (Recorded) |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | — | 5.0 | +5.0 | LMAX Group (Recorded) |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | — | 0.0 | +0.0 | LMAX Group (Recorded) |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | — | 7.9 | +7.9 | LMAX Group (Recorded) |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | — | 7.9 | +7.9 | LMAX Group (Recorded) |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: GOOD vs LMAX Group
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | GOOD | LMAX Group |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | GOOD | LMAX Group |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 3 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | US | Yellow Building 1A Nicholas Road London W11 4AN UNITED KINGDOM |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Imported software record | Forex, precious metals, stock indices, commodities, cryptocurrencies and more |
| Execution Software & Terminals | GOOD | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Other languages, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare GOOD and LMAX Group against other regulated peers in our electronic trading terminals, execution gateways, fix bridge topologies and multi-broker software builds slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: GOOD vs LMAX Group
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: GOOD or LMAX Group?
LMAX Group holds more active regulated filings (3 vs 0). Specifically, GOOD maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas LMAX Group maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (FSPR, CYSEC, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between GOOD and LMAX Group?
In Terminal Ledger Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), GOOD records an Overall Score of — (Risk & Licensing: —, Brand: —, Market Influence: —, User Reputation: —, Execution & Software: —), compared with LMAX Group at 7.9 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 7.9, Brand: 7.9, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0).
How do GOOD and LMAX Group differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
GOOD lists Imported software record with execution software [GOOD], while LMAX Group lists Forex, precious metals, stock indices, commodities, cryptocurrencies and more with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: GOOD or LMAX Group?
GOOD carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while LMAX Group carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.