1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
GOOD vs Oqtima: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of GOOD (GOOD) and Oqtima (CDE Global Markets Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Electronic trading terminals, execution gateways, FIX bridge topologies and multi-broker software builds
- GOOD 6D Score
- —
- Oqtima 6D Score
- 7.9
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 2
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Oqtima outranks GOOD by +7.9 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.9 vs —)
On supervisory breadth, GOOD holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Oqtima holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | GOOD | Oqtima | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | — | 7.9 | +7.9 | Oqtima (Recorded) |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | — | 8.0 | +8.0 | Oqtima (Recorded) |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | — | 4.0 | +4.0 | Oqtima (Recorded) |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | — | 0.0 | +0.0 | Oqtima (Recorded) |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | — | 6.9 | +6.9 | Oqtima (Recorded) |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | — | 6.0 | +6.0 | Oqtima (Recorded) |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: GOOD vs Oqtima
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | GOOD | Oqtima |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | GOOD | CDE Global Markets Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | US | IMAD COMPLEX, Office 7, UNIT 204, 2nd Floor, Ile Du Port, Seychelles |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Imported software record | Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Indices, Forex, Stocks |
| Execution Software & Terminals | GOOD | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English, Spanish, Japanese, French and other languages |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare GOOD and Oqtima against other regulated peers in our electronic trading terminals, execution gateways, fix bridge topologies and multi-broker software builds slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: GOOD vs Oqtima
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: GOOD or Oqtima?
Oqtima holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, GOOD maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Oqtima maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, Financial Services Authority Seychelles) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between GOOD and Oqtima?
In Terminal Ledger Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), GOOD records an Overall Score of — (Risk & Licensing: —, Brand: —, Market Influence: —, User Reputation: —, Execution & Software: —), compared with Oqtima at 7.9 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 8.0, Brand: 6.9, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do GOOD and Oqtima differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
GOOD lists Imported software record with execution software [GOOD], while Oqtima lists Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Indices, Forex, Stocks with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: GOOD or Oqtima?
GOOD carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Oqtima carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.