1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
IB vs Kraken: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of IB (Interactive Brokers Hong Kong Limited) and Kraken (Kraken) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Electronic trading terminals, execution gateways, FIX bridge topologies and multi-broker software builds
- IB 6D Score
- 8.0
- Kraken 6D Score
- —
- Regulated Licences
- 5 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
IB outranks Kraken by +8.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (8.0 vs —)
On supervisory breadth, IB holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Kraken holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | IB | Kraken | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 8.0 | — | +8.0 | IB (Recorded) |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 8.0 | — | +8.0 | IB (Recorded) |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 6.0 | — | +6.0 | IB (Recorded) |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | — | +0.0 | IB (Recorded) |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 8.0 | — | +8.0 | IB (Recorded) |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 8.0 | — | +8.0 | IB (Recorded) |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: IB vs Kraken
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | IB | Kraken |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Interactive Brokers Hong Kong Limited | Kraken |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | One Pickwick Plaza, Greenwich, CT 06830 USA | US |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Stocks, options, futures, currencies, securities, etc. | Imported software record |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | Kraken |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, Portuguese, English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare IB and Kraken against other regulated peers in our electronic trading terminals, execution gateways, fix bridge topologies and multi-broker software builds slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: IB vs Kraken
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: IB or Kraken?
IB holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 0). Specifically, IB maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (MAS, FSA, IIROC, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Kraken maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between IB and Kraken?
In Terminal Ledger Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), IB records an Overall Score of 8.0 (Risk & Licensing: 8.0, Brand: 8.0, Market Influence: 8.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 6.0), compared with Kraken at — Overall (Risk & Licensing: —, Brand: —, Market Influence: —, User Reputation: —, Execution & Software: —).
How do IB and Kraken differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
IB lists Stocks, options, futures, currencies, securities, etc. with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Kraken lists Imported software record with execution software [Kraken]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: IB or Kraken?
IB carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Kraken carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.