1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
IB vs LMAX Group: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of IB (Interactive Brokers Hong Kong Limited) and LMAX Group (LMAX Group) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Electronic trading terminals, execution gateways, FIX bridge topologies and multi-broker software builds
- IB 6D Score
- 8.0
- LMAX Group 6D Score
- 7.9
- Regulated Licences
- 5 vs 3
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
IB outranks LMAX Group by +0.1 pts in composite 6D scoring (8.0 vs 7.9)
On supervisory breadth, IB holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas LMAX Group holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | IB | LMAX Group | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 8.0 | 7.9 | +0.1 | IB |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 8.0 | 7.9 | +0.1 | IB |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | IB |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 8.0 | 7.9 | +0.1 | IB |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 8.0 | 7.9 | +0.1 | IB |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: IB vs LMAX Group
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | IB | LMAX Group |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Interactive Brokers Hong Kong Limited | LMAX Group |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1) | 3 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | One Pickwick Plaza, Greenwich, CT 06830 USA | Yellow Building 1A Nicholas Road London W11 4AN UNITED KINGDOM |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Stocks, options, futures, currencies, securities, etc. | Forex, precious metals, stock indices, commodities, cryptocurrencies and more |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, Portuguese, English | Other languages, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare IB and LMAX Group against other regulated peers in our electronic trading terminals, execution gateways, fix bridge topologies and multi-broker software builds slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: IB vs LMAX Group
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: IB or LMAX Group?
IB holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 3). Specifically, IB maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (MAS, FSA, IIROC, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas LMAX Group maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (FSPR, CYSEC, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between IB and LMAX Group?
In Terminal Ledger Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), IB records an Overall Score of 8.0 (Risk & Licensing: 8.0, Brand: 8.0, Market Influence: 8.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 6.0), compared with LMAX Group at 7.9 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 7.9, Brand: 7.9, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0).
How do IB and LMAX Group differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
IB lists Stocks, options, futures, currencies, securities, etc. with execution software [MT4, MT5], while LMAX Group lists Forex, precious metals, stock indices, commodities, cryptocurrencies and more with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: IB or LMAX Group?
IB carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while LMAX Group carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.