Institution record
Bithumb
- Source score
- 5.0
- Source exposures
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (electronic trading terminals, execution gateways, fix bridge topologies and multi-broker software builds) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Financial Services Commission | 220-88-71844 | Exceeded scope | — | 2014-01-20 |
Peer source record comparison
Compare imported fields for Bithumb and other records in our electronic trading terminals, execution gateways, fix bridge topologies and multi-broker software builds dataset. These are not independent audit findings.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Source exposures |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bithumb (this record) | Financial Services Commission | 0 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
| None on file | 0 / 0 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 | |
| None on file | 0 / 0 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 | |
| None on file | 0 / 0 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 | |
| None on file | 0 / 0 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 | |
| None on file | 0 / 0 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
Bithumb: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Bithumb's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
The imported dataset contains 1 licence entry associated with Bithumb (legal entity reference: Bithumb); 0 are labelled "regulated" and 0 are labelled regulated or registered: Financial Services Commission — licence 220-88-71844, status: exceeded scope. These fields are not independent confirmation of current authorisation. Check the exact contracting entity and registration number on the official Financial Services Commission public register.
Which of Bithumb's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
No matching licence records were found in this site's electronic trading terminals, execution gateways, fix bridge topologies and multi-broker software builds source selection. The dataset may be incomplete; check the relevant official registers before drawing conclusions about authorisation or jurisdiction.
What is Bithumb's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Bithumb carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 5.0, risk & licensing: 5.0, brand: 5.0, market influence: 5.0, user reputation: 0.0). The imported source lists 0 exposure entries and 1 licence record with elevated status flags (Financial Services Commission: exceeded scope). Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Bithumb's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Bithumb, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 source exposure entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to Financial Services Commission.